Home Blog Page 74

Ford Launches 2.7L and 3.0L EcoBoost Recall After Engine Failures On Bronco, Edge, Explorer and Lincoln Aviator, Nautilus

(Image: TFL Studios)

Some of Ford’s 2.7L and 3.0L EcoBoost engines may harbor a catastrophic problem.

By sheer sales numbers, you could reasonably argue that the revived Ford Bronco has been one of the Blue Oval’s major successes of the decade so far. That success hasn’t come without its problems, though, and here’s another we can officially add to the list: a new recall affecting more than 90,000 vehicles including early examples the explosively popular Bronco, as well as the even more popular Explorer, the Edge, and the Lincoln Aviator and Nautilus SUVs, as well as the F-150 pickup.

Specifically, some engines may have intake valves prone to fractures or braking, which would in turn cause catastrophic engine damage. If that happens, drivers (naturally) lose motive power, and that may increase the risk of an accident, apart from leaving them stranded. Ford says through a chronology report submitted to the NHTSA that it began looking into the problem in January 2022, with the Lincoln Aviator and Nautilus. Throughout the following months, the company expanded its investigation to other models equipped with the 2.7-liter and 3.0-liter ‘Nano’ EcoBoost engines.

As of August 9, 2024, Ford says it is aware of 811 global warranty claims related to the issue, with report dates ranging between February 13, 2021 and June 3, 2024. It is also aware of 267 field reports and 223 customer reports claiming severe engine damage from defective intake valves between 2020 and 2023.

Of the 90,736 vehicles covered under the recall, here’s how the situation breaks down by model:

(Year) ModelEnginesAffected UnitsStarting Build DateEnding Build Date
2021-2022 Ford F-1502.7L47,719May 1, 2021October 31, 2021
2021-2022 Ford Bronco 2.7L and 3.0L15,835May 1, 2021October 30, 2021
2021-2022 Ford Explorer3.0L14,262June 7, 2021October 31, 2021
2021-2022 Ford Edge 2.7L2,366May 10, 2021October 29, 2021
2021-2022 Lincoln Aviator3.0L7,199June 7, 2021October 31, 2021
2021-2022 Lincoln Nautilus2.7L3,355May 10, 2021October 29, 2021

As Ford explained the problem to the NHTSA, the problematic intake valves “may have grinding burn and over-specification hardness at the third keeper groove location in the valve.” The valves were supplied by Eaton Corporation, from its manufacturing plant in Kearney, Nebraska.

Signs of the problem and Ford’s fix

Even before this recall campaign, problems with 2.7-liter and 3.0-liter EcoBoost engines grenading themselves have garnered widespread discussion over the past couple years. A probe by the NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation kicked off in October 2023 to determine the scale of the problem, with the investigation including no fewer than 708,837 vehicles across some of Ford’s most popular lineups.

The automaker notes owners may see an engine malfunction indicator light and possibly experience the vehicle running rough before full-on engine failure and loss of motive power.

Ford says it will notify owners of the problem as part of this recall campaign by October 11. Dealers will receive notification on the recall and the remedy by the end of September.

To fix the problem, dealer technicians will inspect the cumulative number of engine cycles and conduct an “engine cycle accumulation test” on each vehicle, and replace engines of vehicles that fail that test at no cost to the owner. Those who paid out to fix the the problem prior to the official recall may be eligible for reimbursement. A decent portion of these vehicles should still be within their manufacturer warranty, but those who drive longer distances (like F-150 owners, for example) may need to take the reimbursement route.

Replacement engines, Ford says, are manufactured with intake valves that are within the automaker’s specification for hardness.

U.S. Regulators Link 28th Death to Exploding Takata Airbag Inflators

(Image: Honda)

The NHTSA said a driver died in 2018 from an exploding Takata airbag inflator in a Honda Civic, marking the 28th death linked to the ongoing recall campaign.

If you’re sick of hearing about the Takata airbag inflator recall and the millions of vehicles impacted, that’s completely understandable, but a new statement shows the dire consequences the dangerous defect poses to scores of U.S. drivers. This week, news broke that safety regulators definitively linked another death to an exploding Takata inflator, bringing the total up to 28 American drivers. Worldwide, the total stands at 36.

According to a statement by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the Alabama driver was killed while driving a 2004 Honda Civic back in 2018. As for why it took so long to make that determination, the high-speed nature of this particular crash supposedly made it difficult to narrow down the Takata inflator as the cause of death. As of this moment, though, the NHTSA gave no further details.

Honda and Acura, for their part, are still urging owners of affected vehicles to have the recall work completed to replace the faulty OEM inflators at a dealership as soon as possible. The company says 95% of the impacted recall population — including early 2000s and 2010s examples of popular models like the Accord, Civic, CR-V and Pilot, among others — have been repaired. Owners can check Honda or Acura‘s recall websites to determine whether their specific vehicle needs the work done or not.

To date, the Takata airbag inflator scandal stands as the largest set of automotive recalls in U.S. history, affecting more than 67 million inflators here and 100 million worldwide. The impact of 28 fatalities since 2009 as well as the crushing financial toll of such a massive campaign pitched Takata into bankruptcy in April 2018.

2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 Gets XRT Treatment and Larger Battery Packs

2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 interior
(Images: Hyundai)

The updated 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 — including the new XRT trim — will hit dealers this fall.

Ever since we took Hyundai’s new Ioniq 5 EV cross-country a couple years ago, we keep saying that it’s a good option if you want a Tesla alternative. With its general size and layout, I’d also call it more of a hatchback than a small crossover (that’s what the Kona’s for, in my opinion), but Hyundai insists the Ioniq 5 is one. To wit, it’s bringing out an updated version of the model it launched three years ago with beefier battery packs onboard and a decidedly SUV-like XRT trim.

Naturally, the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 XRT gets a dual-motor, all-wheel drive setup, as well as lifted and retuned suspenion suspension and more aggressive tires. The lift brings a ground clearance to around 7 inches — still no mountaineer, but certainly better than before. Wrapped around the 18-inch wheels are some Continental all-terrain tires. You do actually get some recovery hooks, which is a nice touch for those who do actually venture off pavement. Approach and departure angles improve slightly with the higher ride height, to 19.8 and 30 degrees respectively). Apart from the mechanical changes, the XRT gets blacked out badging and trim just like its bigger SUV siblings, as well as black interior with all-weather floor mats and leatherette seats.

Even when it initially debuted, the Ioniq 5 was already a funky little car, but the XRT takes things a step further with a black-and-gray camo pattern on the bumpers and some of the trim, which also helps set it apart from the rest of the range.

2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 interior

More tweaks are coming across the entire Ioniq 5 lineup

While the new XRT trim is joining the lineup, the rest of the Ioniq 5 range sees other notable tweaks too. Another noteworthy change comes with the two available battery packs, both of which are larger this year. The standard pack is now 63-kWh instead of 58-kWh, while the larger pack increases in size from 77.4-kWh to 84-kWh. Range improves across the board as a result, with Hyundai promising anywhere from 250 to 280 miles or more depending on your wheel and tire package. For the XRT, expect to see range land on the lower end of that band with the knobbier rubber.

If you’re looking for the best range of the bunch, you’ll want to stick with the longer range battery available on rear-wheel drive SE/SEL/Limited models. Instead of 303 miles on a charge, Hyundai says you’ll be able to get 310-plus. The SE Standard Range gets a bump too, though, so the value option will offer up 240-plus miles instead of the 210 miles current models manage.

Barring the XRT’s unique changes, the rest of the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 lineup gets more minor tweaks. Restyled front and rear bumpers fill out the updated range, as well as a new rear spoiler and more aerodynamic wheels. New roof rails are available, and you can get one of three new matte exterior colors: Atlas White, Ecotronic Gray and Celadon Gray. Inside, you get redesigned HVAC controls, a revamped center console with physical buttons for the seat heaters, an updated steering wheel and heated rear seats on SEL and higher trims. Across the range, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto capability are both now wireless, and Hyundai notes it reinforced the doors and B-pillars for better side impact protection (an area where new cars have been struggling lately, thanks to tougher IIHS side crash tests).

Hyundai is building this Ioniq 5 in the U.S. to gain access to a partial EV tax credit

When it goes on sale this fall, 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 buyers will be able to actually get a tax credit when they purchase their car. Hyundai plans to build this car at its new “Metaplant America” outside Savannah, Georgia, and as a result it will gain access to a partial $3,750 tax credit. If you lease the Ioniq 5, though, you will still get the full $7,500 tax credit in calculating your monthly payments.

If you’re wanting a bit more convenience with your new EV, Hyundai is making good on its promise to switch its vehicles to NACS later this year. Starting in the fourth quarter, new and refreshed EVs (including the 2025 Ioniq 5) will ship with a native NACS port, while Hyundai will sell its new EVs with a CCS adapter. Right now it’s the other way around: Current Ioniq 5s and other EVs ship with a CCS port, while you have to buy a NACS adapter to use Tesla Superchargers, for example.

Hyundai did not give any word yet on what’s happening with the performance-minded Ioniq 5 N, though we’ll surely get more specific information about that soon.

Check out this Nifty Preview of the Upcoming Nissan Armada

For folks who don’t know, the Nissan Armada, (and Infiniti QX80) are based on the Nissan Patrol, a vehicle that’s been produced since 1951. Now, a new one is coming!

I grabbed this image from a nice historic retrospective on the life of the Nissan Patrol, which was every bit as good (if not better) than the FJ/Land Cruiser – in many instances. The piece was written by the Nissan Motor Corporation, and it also shows the grill of the upcoming Nissan Patrol. That grill should be similar to the one on the upcoming Armada.

Despite the modern Patrol/Armada being a rather swarthy, modern vehicle, it still shares some of the original DNA. It still has a gas engine, and is going back to six cylinders. It’s still is a body-on-frame truck underneath, and it’s still a 4×4. Granted, the original Nissan Patrols had a large displacement I6 (4-liter) and a manual transmission. Over time, they were offered in dozens of configurations.

The new Nissan Armada, and Patrol will be going toe-to-toe with the Toyota Sequoia being the same size. While we don’t know the next Armada’s power numbers, I’m pretty sure it will have a similar VR35DDTT 3.5-liter twin-turbocharged engine that the new QX80 has. In that vehicle, it’s rated at 450 horsepower and 516 lb-ft of torque. The Nissan variant may get slightly less power. In addition, I’d be willing to bet that the next Armada and Patrol get that same nine-speed automatic transmission too.

A (potentially) big clue from that teased image.

If you look at the grill of the Nissan Pathfinder Rock Creek, or even the new Nissan Rogue Rock Creek, you’ll notice a unique grill on both. It’s supposed to look more rugged, and (perhaps) a bit macho. The snout has distinctive grill snouts and all share a similar design theme.

If you look at the main image, you’ll see a similar design – and that’s a new Armada grill. This quickly leads me to speculate that we could be looking at a Rock Creek, or other more rugged version of the next Nissan Armada. That could simply mean a tire, wheel and trim update, like the Rogue. Then again, maybe Nissan listened and decided to add proper off-road tires, beefier suspension and maybe even a locker in a version of the new Armada.

One can hope.

Ask Nathan: The Badass Hyundai N Vision 74 is Going Into Production and – Can Someone Save Chrysler?

In this week’s Ask Nathan:

  • Hyundai N Vision 74 will be built!
  • Will Chrysler die, or is someone trying to save it?

The first question comes from an older post regarding the Hyundai N Vision 74. It was a response to a post I penned a while back.

Q: (ViaTwittwr/X @NathanAdlen): Dude, they (Hyundai) would never build the N Vision 74.

It’s just a concept homes (“Holmes?”), you need to calm TF down. You get all hyper about weird cars that never get built or went away because no one wanted them. You crazy bro.

– Seedy78

A: If I’m so crazy, why is Hyundai building the N Vision 74?

Yea, I like oddballs, but I’m not the only one. As for the Hyundai N Vision 74, it look like it’s part of a package Hyundai just announced at their recent “investor day” event. The company wants to produce 21 all-new vehicles by 2030, including the Hyundai N Vision 74. Oh, and YES – it’s supposed to be a fuel cell (hydrogen gulping) vehicle.

With that out of the way, I wanted to throw some speculation at this announcement. I suspect that there may be a few powertrains they may pack inside the N Vision 74 (or whatever name they officially give it). I mean, it makes sense, right? If you have a platform that can underpin something that looks like this vehicle, with rear-drive, why not use it? Hyundai/Kia M-platform anyone?

In its concept form, it’s supposed to make 670 horsepower fuel cell system that sits between two 4.2kg hydrogen tanks. All of that feeds a 62.4kWh battery, which is small by today’s standards. Still it might help with weight. Once again, it’s hard to say if Hyundai is keeping to just one powertrain with this awesome looking machine.

Yes – that’s my opinion on its odd-ball styling. Then again, if there was enough clamor from the world to build this thing, I guess I’m not the only one.

I’m starting to get excited!

Sorry – not sorry.

– N

The last question comes from a Chrysler fan who wants to save the company. It’s also dated about a year ago, but with the new announcement covered in (this) post, I found it relevant.

Q: Is there any way to save Chrysler?

Grew up a MOPAR guy in a MOPAR family. We had good and bad luck but never waivered from keeping a Dodge or Chrysler or a Ram in the family. Even my sister has a Jeep. And I know that things are bad right now. Do you think anyone or a company can stop Stellantis from killing off Chrysler? It looks like it’s happening soon.

– Morris from Calgary

A: Hi Morris.

I honestly don’t know if this announcement has any legs, or if it’s just an attempt at a money grab – but – there’s something going on. Frank B. Rhodes Jr, great grandson to Walter P. Chrysler penned a letter to find investors, and rally the troops. He tried this before, but this time (some “experts” say) he’s got a lot more momentum.

In the letter, he shows his displeasure that Chrysler has just one product (a minivan) and that they have been passed over for funding new production vehicles. He’s also quite upset at the Stellantis leadership, their use of funds, pay and relationship with the UAW. He’s calling for investors to gather, and buy the automaker back.

Does that include Jeep, Ram and Dodge? I’m pretty sure the answer is no as Jeep and Ram actually make Stellantis money. I’m not too sure about Dodge, but they are about to come out with a few new products. Honestly, I don’t know,

Here’s one thing I’m pretty sure about. Stellantis is aware of Chrysler’s impending doom, and their leadership has been kicking the can down the road for too long. Sure, we should see an EV Airflow, or something like it, soon. One new car may not be enough, and if they follow typical Stellantis strategy, they will overprice themselves out of the market.

There was a rumor that Chrysler was going to get a small crossover based on the Hornet/Tonale, but that stopped with the poor reception of the vehicle. It’s just a rumor, but it would account for the huge hole in Chrysler’s lineup.

– N

(Video) The 3-Row 2025 Volvo EX90 EV Hands-On Review: Everything You Need to Know!

The 2025 Volvo EX90 EV is a breakthrough vehicle for the automaker, but is it a day late and a dollar short?

There will be two versions of the 2025 Volvo EX90 EV that starts with the 402 horsepower standard Twin-Motor model, and ending with the 510 hp Twin-Motor-Performance model. Both will have the massive 111.0 kWh battery, and are supposed to be capable of up to 308 miles range. That is, if you get the 21-inch wheels. If you get the 20 or 22-inch wheels, that mileage drops to 296 miles. Curious that the midsize wheel is the most efficient option.

Equipped with a 400 Watt architecture, the EX90’s “typical” from 10 to 80% with 250kW DC fast charging takes about 30-minutes. That’s according to Volvo. Its closest competitor, the Kia EV9 has a higher charge rate. Volvo says the EX90 can charge up to 100-percent on Level II in 10-hours a using single phase 45A charger. Overnight charging should be no issue for those who can.

Volvo EX90

You can read about the EX90’s production delays (here).

The Kia EV9, Tesla Model-X, and the Rivian RS-1 have already beaten Volvo to the market. Soon there will be quite a few players lining up to be competitive.

Packaging and proportions are very close to the current XC90 (a new model is due soon), this crossover is set up to hold seven passengers in three rows. Roman takes us through a comprehensive tour of the interior of the 2025 Volvo EX90 EV, and gives us his impressions. He’s not happy with the Tesla-like screen controls, and “plastickey” steering wheel controls. He does like the overall ease of use with the system, and marveled at the recycled components used inside.

Roman, at over 6’2″ needs space, but he’s willing to push himself by entering the second and third row of the Volvo. As he ventures into the back, he muses about the U.S., Swedish, and Chinese roots of this vehicle. Watching him getting in and out of the third row is worth the watch alone.

Starting at $79,995 MSRP, the 2025 Volvo EX90 EV will be in dealerships in late 2024, but you can reserve one now.

Check out the video!

The Next Chevy Van is an All-ELectric BrightDrop Delivery Van?

The Chevy van is alive… ish. In a move to increase recognition, and increase sales, General Motors and BrightDrop will fold the all-electric delivery van into the Chevy brand.

Yes, we still have a Chevy van known as the Express van, but it’s been in production since the mid 90’s. BrightDrop, an EV company was recently fully integrated into General Motors. They built a delivery vehicle that competes with the Mercedes-Benz EV, Ford E-Transit and Rivian van – among others. Unfortunately, only a handful of companies knew about, and purchased the van. Production numbers are well below expectations.

BrightDrop vans are produced at GM’s CAMI Assembly plant in Ingersoll, Ontario. In 2023, approximately 500 of these EV vans were sold. This year could double that, but it’s still well below expectations. Folding the van into Chevrolet could help with recognition and sales.

“It’s got that strength of the Chevrolet brand behind it. It’s absolutely going to drive volume. It helps our customers that choose to go into EVs to easily do so working with the Chevrolet dealer they know and trust now for their other fleet needs.”

Sandor Piszar, vice president of the GM Envolve fleet business in North America (Via: CNBC)

This electric Chevy van will be a burden on some dealerships.

Simply put: the BrightDrop 400 and 600 are anything but small, or ordinary. In order to service, repair and prep these vehicles, many dealerships need upgrades. Many upgrades.

These dealerships will need a dedicated staff just for these EVs. We are talking about complex electronics that require special training to service. In addition, these vans weigh a lot more than a pickup truck. Special, heavy-duty lifts will be needed as well. On top of all that, dealerships that have been resistant to installing chargers will have to reconsider.

BrightDrop currently sells two all-electric commercial vans, called the Zevo 400 and Zevo 600, will be rebranded as Chevrolet BrightDrop 400 and 600 vans. The specs remain the same, but there’s bound to be a few branding changes, but there has been no announcement about any significant changes.

Both vans have a GVWR of up to 11,000-lbs, and have 3,180 and 3,580-lbs of cargo capacity, depending on the model The big news is the range coming from some massive Ultium power packs. The BrightDrop 400, which has 412.1 cubic feet of cargo space, has a maximum combined range of 159 miles, combined. The larger BrightDrop 600, which has 614.7 cu-ft of cargo space gets up to 164 miles.

Unladen, both trucks have an estimated 272 miles of range, combined. In addition, they both come standard with all-wheel drive (AWD) and currently have a base price of around $75,000, but that’s before incentives and tax credits.

The big question: can non-fleet buyers get one?

Talk about a sweet undercarriage for an all-electric RV, or the potential as an EV people mover. Unfortunately, GM and Chevrolet have been mum on non-fleet sales. If there’s enough interest, and potential for GM profits, something may change.

The Chevrolet BrightDrop 400 and 600 will be in dealerships soon.

Could Walter P. Chrysler’s Great Grandson Buy Chrysler Back from Stellantis?

Many of us know that Chrysler (among other brands) is circling the drain, but can it be saved? If so, by who?

Frank BRhodes Jr‘s great-grandfather, Walter P. Chrysler founded the Chrysler Corporation in 1925. This is his second attempt at gathering investors together to remove Chrysler, and most of their counterparts, from the control of a larger entity. While the idea seems far-fetched to some, there is a growing number of supporters of this idea.

Simply put: Chrysler is only building minivans. Sure, the 300c is still in the lineup, but that’s ending soon. You can read about the final Chrysler 300c rolling off the assembly line (here). To Stellantis and Chrysler’s credit, they did state that many new vehicles will be coming out soon. We are still waiting on finding out what will officially be in production.

In a public letter, which I copied from moparinsiders.com, Rhodes shares his sadness and frustration with Stellantis with their handling of his great grandfather’s legacy. In addition, he shows his displeasure at Stellantis’ CEO, Carlos Tavares’ payday, UAW woes, China’s influence and the fact that Chrysler has been pushed aside so that other Stellantis brands can get a leg up.

Indeed, we’ve covered the Stellantis situation several times, and some of their brands seem to be sinking, as others rise. The situation for brands like Chrysler is desperate, but is this the solution? Check out the letter below, and let us know what you think!

Chrysler Pacifica vs. Toyota Sienna - featured

Letter penned by Frank BRhodes Jr, Walter P. Chrysler’s great grandson.

I am writing to you today not just as a concerned citizen but as someone with a deep, personal connection to one of our nation’s most iconic brands. My great-grandfather, Walter P. Chrysler, founded the Chrysler Corporation in 1925, a company that has since become a cornerstone of American automotive history. As we approach the 100th anniversary of Chrysler, with plans for what could be the largest gathering of Chrysler products ever seen in North America at next year’s Chrysler Carlisle event, I believe the time for change is now. And I am ready to lead that change.’

The Chrysler Airflow Concept is designed to achieve between a 350- and 400-mile range on a single charge.

For the past 45 years, I have proudly served as a Brand Ambassador for Chrysler. I’ve seen the highs and lows, the triumphs and challenges. But today, I believe we are at a critical juncture. The Chrysler brand, once a symbol of innovation and American ingenuity, is now at risk of fading into obscurity due to what I believe are poor decisions and mismanagement by its current owners, Stellantis.

The 2023 Chrysler 300C features a new iteration of the tri-color 300C badge and black chrome accents on the grille and lower fascia.


Stellantis, a company that seems out of touch with the American market, has allowed sales to decline, delayed new product launches, and put the livelihoods of our dealers and workers in jeopardy. Prices are soaring, layoffs are looming, and the future of the brand hangs in the balance. Meanwhile, Stellantis’ CEO, Carlos Tavares, earns a staggering $39.5 million salary, a figure that seems grossly out of proportion given the struggles facing the company.

My great-grandfather was hired by General Motors (GM) in 1911 to save the failing Buick brand. Within a few years, he turned Buick into GM’s most profitable division. But even back then, poor management decisions, like investing in impractical projects, threatened to derail his efforts. This mirrors the situation today, where Stellantis’s investments in ventures like Archer Aviation seem to distract from the core business of building great cars. These funds would be better spent on revitalizing the Chrysler brand.

Image via: Allpar.com


The current management at Stellantis, overseeing more than 15 different brands, cannot give Chrysler the necessary attention. The result? Mediocrity at best. And now, with the potential entry of Chinese automaker BYD into the U.S. market, our industry faces an even greater threat. The influx of cheap cars could devastate our manufacturing base, and this is not just a possibility—it is a fact.

I was hopeful when Christine Feuell was appointed to lead the Chrysler brand. But year after year, we see Chrysler’s products being pushed further down the priority list while slow-selling brands like Fiat, Alfa Romeo, and Maserati receive more attention. Chrysler has deep roots in the American market, serving as a reliable and accessible option for the middle class. Does Stellantis understand this? Chrysler needs new products now, not tomorrow, not next year—now.


Recently, United Auto Workers (UAW) President Shawn Fain criticized Stellantis and Carlos Tavares for failing to honor contracts. I stand with our workers, but it’s clear that the current approach is not working. Stellantis and GM are pricing themselves out of the market, and layoffs seem inevitable. This is a situation that cannot continue.

But I am not without hope. I am confident that investors will see the potential in resurrecting this historic brand. My vision is to bring Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep®, and Ram back as an American-owned company that focuses not only on profits but also on the people who build these cars. I propose creating a new Chrysler Corporation, with workers as part-owners of the company. This would give them a stake in the success of the company and ensure that their jobs are secure.


This plan would also allow Stellantis to save face by exploring all options while offloading Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep®, and Ram to a company that truly cares about their future. This is not just a business opportunity but a chance to restore pride in an American icon and secure the future for thousands of workers.

The situation is dire, but with the right leadership and a clear vision, I believe we can turn things around. The time for action is now, and I am ready to step up and save the brand that my great-grandfather built. With the support of investors and the commitment of our workers, we can ensure that the Chrysler name lives on for another 100 years.

Sincerely,
Frank B. Rhodes, Jr.

###

We’ll update everyone when we hear what (if anything) comes of this.

Latest Videos

Latest Reviews

Latest News

Latest Views